In 2025, consumers have more ways to pay than ever before, but not all options are created equal. While credit and debit cards remain the dominant method in many developed markets, mobile apps, QR codes and Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services have surged in popularity, especially among the younger demographics. Mastercard’s 2024 report notes a sharp increase in contactless and app-based payments globally, with digital wallets now accounting for over half of in-store transactions in some Asian markets.
Yet, these developments are not universally accepted. Sweden has become nearly cashless, with fewer than 8% of payments involving physical currency, according to its central bank. Whereas countries like Spain, continue to see strong public support for cash, with 65% of low-value transactions still settled with coins and notes.
Across Europe, regulations are shaping payment habits. Some governments encourage digital use through tax incentives or payment caps, while others are responding to public backlash by reinforcing the right to pay with cash. For businesses, this creates a divided environment. Retailers face pressure to meet legal standards and build consumer trust, especially as payment options move from being purely functional to a reflection of brand accessibility.
As more options emerge, the gap widens between those who can adopt digital tools and those who cannot. For cross-border organisations, recognising these regional differences is key to managing risks and keeping customers.
Global payment landscape in 2025: what are our options?
As said, Scandinavia leads in digital payments. This is thanks to policies and consumer habits aligning. Much of Southeast Asia and Africa have actually skipped traditional banking. Tools like GCash in the Philippines and M-Pesa in Kenya have made mobile wallets common, especially for people without bank accounts.
In sharp contrast, Spain resists full digitisation. Despite regulatory nudges, including limitations on cash transactions and incentives for card use, a clear majority still prefer notes and coins for everyday buying. Policy is driving much of the shift in India. India’s Unified Payment Interface (UPI) has made instant mobile payments standard, while the EU is using digital finance to boost transparency and improve tax enforcement.
The cashless appeal: why governments and businesses are all in
Governments and large financial institutions have strong incentives to push for cashless adoption. Digital payments leave a complete audit trail; every transaction is time-stamped and geo-tagged. This traceability helps close tax gaps and limits the flow of undeclared income. From a regulatory standpoint, it simplifies anti-money laundering enforcement and tightens oversight across informal sectors. For tax authorities and policymakers, cashless systems are not just efficient, they’re strategic tools for compliance and control.
Large businesses gain clear advantages. Digital payments cut the cost and hassle of handling cash – no safes, less theft risk and lower insurance costs. They also turn payment data into a useful tool for marketing and tracking customer habits.
Technology has accelerated this shift. Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services appeal to credit-averse consumers, while mobile-first “super apps” integrate payment, savings and lending into a single interface. These platforms gain traction fastest in markets with high smartphone penetration but limited banking infrastructure, such as parts of Southeast Asia.
The benefits are clear, but there are trade-offs. Digital payments are built for transparency, not privacy. That helps governments with oversight, but it raises concerns for consumers, who are now starting to question how much privacy they’re giving up for convenience.
The human side of cash: why many are pushing back
For a growing number of consumers, the choice to pay with cash is no longer just a habit, it is a statement. In countries like Spain and the UK, where government and corporate pressure to adopt digital payments is mounting, resistance has emerged not from political opposition, but from ordinary people who see cash as a line of defence against surveillance and control. Privacy remains at the heart of the issue. Cash offers anonymity. Card and app payments do not. With each digital transaction logged and stored, individuals become traceable, and this overreach is sparking backlash.
In Spain, community-led “cash-only days” have been promoted as a form of peaceful protest. In the UK, public frustration is building toward retailers that refuse to accept notes and coins, especially among older or rural consumers who may lack digital access. Small businesses are also caught in the middle. While digital systems can streamline payments, they come with processing fees and technical issues. Some are even seeing a drop in foot traffic after switching to card-only models.
When the public says “no”: five successful boycotts that shifted power
Public pushback against cashless mandates is growing. In both Europe and the US, boycotts and policy changes show that consumers are not only concerned, but also ready to act to defend access to cash.
In the UK, grassroots efforts by small businesses have led to a resurgence of “Cash Welcome Here” signs. These initiatives emerged in response to widespread public frustration with retailers refusing cash during and after the pandemic. The Metro reported a measurable increase in customer support for cash-accepting establishments between 2023 and 2025.
Spain has also seen targeted backlash. New rules requiring card payments for purchases over €1,000 were met with strong opposition, particularly among older citizens and the privacy conscious. Calls for cash-only events and protests have increased in frequency.
In the US, legislative responses to boycotts have taken hold. Cities like San Francisco and New York have passed laws prohibiting retail establishments from going entirely cashless, referring to it as exclusion and discrimination.
France has seen a quieter, union-led movement to defend access to physical money, particularly in the welfare sector. Pensioner groups have campaigned against QR-only social payments, framing the issue as a threat to social equity and accessibility. On platforms like Reddit, users have organised soft boycotts of major retailers that refuse cash, elevating local protests into wider attention.
Criminal adaptation: will a cashless society disrupt organised crime?
Cashless systems are often promoted as a way to fight organised crime. Cash is hard to trace, making it useful for money laundering and illegal deals. Cutting out physical currency seems like a logical step to disrupt these activities. But the reality is more complicated.
Scotland’s Police Authority notes that while going cashless may reduce street-level crime, organised crime groups are already adapting. These groups work across borders and use digital tools like cryptocurrencies, prepaid cards and shell companies to move money without being easily tracked.
Malta’s 2025 Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment supports this view. While some crimes like street-level drug sales still use cash, more serious offences now rely on encrypted platforms and complex financial tools. Without stronger regulation and enforcement, phasing out cash is likely to have only a limited effect on these operations. Analysts warn that pushing all transactions into traceable systems could backfire, driving illegal activity further underground and making it even harder to detect.
Strategic risks of a fully cashless world
Even with the push for digital payments, cash is not going away, it is evolving. In Sweden, the Riksbank has said cash must still be available, especially for emergencies and to ensure no one is excluded. In Spain, a 2025 blackout showed the value of cash. When digital systems went down, cash was the only way to keep transactions moving.
The debate now includes whether access to and use of cash constitutes a basic human right. Financial authors and analysts such as Chris Skinner argue that cash represents the final buffer between personal privacy and total traceability. Cash use may be shrinking, but central banks and civil rights groups still defend it, as both a backup and a basic consumer choice.
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) are expected to coexist with physical cash in the short to medium term. However, CBDCs offer none of the anonymity of notes and coins, prompting further concern about surveillance mission creep. As such, resistance to cash elimination is not only economic, but also ideological.
Conclusion: preserving choice in the age of convenience
The move toward a cashless economy is not just about money, it is a broader societal shift. Digital payments bring speed and convenience, but they also raise concerns about privacy and control.
For businesses, the challenge is to meet customer needs without shutting anyone out. For policymakers, keeping cash available is not about holding on to the past, it is about protecting against system failures and exclusion. And for consumers, it’s important to remember that convenience can come at the cost of choice.
Cash and digital payments do not have to compete. Both can coexist. In a world driven by data, giving people options is not just fair, it is a way to manage risk.
To download a copy of this article, please click here.
